Home   News   Article

Impact of visitors to Sutherland spaceport 'not considered' by Highland Council, court hears


By Ali Morrison

Register for free to read more of the latest local news. It's easy and will only take a moment.



Click here to sign up to our free newsletters!
The spaceport is the first of its kind to be granted planning permission.
The spaceport is the first of its kind to be granted planning permission.

Lawyers acting for the Danish billionaire owner of Topshop have asked a senior judge to overturn Highland Council’s decision to give the go ahead for Scotland’s first spaceport, writes James Mulhollan.

Advocate Malcolm Thomson QC said documents show that the local authority didn’t follow correct procedures when giving permission last August to the construction of the Sutherland Space Hub.

The site would be the UK’s first vertical launch facility and supporters say it could boost the local economy.

However, lawyers for Anders Holch Povlsen (48) believe that Highland Council should have rejected the proposed facility. They have gone to the Court of Session in Edinburgh in a bid to stop the construction of the spaceport.

On Tuesday, Mr Thomson, who is acting for the businessman who owns land close to the proposed site, said documents made available to him and his instructing solicitors show that Highland Council didn’t follow correct procedures.

He told judge Lord Doherty that the council appears not to have properly considered the impact that people visiting the site could have on the local environment.

Mr Thomson said the proposed space site is located close to an “area of environmental protection” but the council hasn’t properly considered how to mitigate the damage that visitors could cause to the area.

Speaking about a document used by the council in their deliberations, Mr Thomson said it had been “heavily redacted”.

He added: “There’s nothing about visitor viewing facilities, car parking, nothing of that nature.

“There are the obvious difficulties about keeping people out of the LEZ (Launch Exclusion Zone) – there’s no physical demarcation of it.

“It’s difficult to understand the confidence that the writer of this document had in the ability to stop people entering the site because it has already been recognised elsewhere that there is a right to roam – people are going to be able to walk on the sites and the strategy that we saw depended on the provision of viewing areas, car parking facilities and the ability to link one to another.”

Mr Thomson was speaking on the first day of a judicial review which is expected to last three days at Scotland’s highest civil court.

Lawyers for Anders Holch Povlsen have begun a judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Lawyers for Anders Holch Povlsen have begun a judicial review at the Court of Session in Edinburgh.

He is acting for Mr Povlsen’s company Wildland Limited. Highland Council is contesting the action and Highlands and Islands Enterprise and the Scottish Ministers are “interested parties” in the action.

Mr Povlsen is Scotland's largest private landowner. He owns the clothing empire Bestseller and is believed to have a net worth of more than £6 billion.

Mr Povlsen is the largest shareholder in online fashion retailer ASOS. In February 2021, the company bought Sir Philip Green’s Arcadia retail empire – which included Topshop, Topman and Miss Selfridge – in a deal thought to be worth £330 million.

The businessman objected to the development in Sutherland on environmental grounds and later announced that he had invested more than £1.4 million in a rival spaceport on Shetland.

His company Wildland Limited lodged a petition for judicial review against Highland council's decision to approve the Sutherland scheme.

The Highlands and Islands Enterprise (HIE) project at A'Mhòine, near Tongue, is expected to create more than 200 jobs, with satellites being launched from the station.

Highland council received 457 objections and 118 representations in support of HIE's planning application.

Wildland's judicial review petition passed the permission stage earlier this year, meaning the court believes the challenge has “a real prospect of success”.

On Tuesday, Mr Thomson told judge Lord Doherty that the case was unique as it was the first of its type in the UK.

He added: “In this judicial review the petitioner seeks reduction of the granting of planning permission by the respondent in favour of the interested party in August 2020.

“It was for the construction of a vertical launch spaceport with launch operations control centre, site integration facility launch pad complex antenna park, access road, and associated infrastructure and land.

“This is an unusual project and I think it maybe the first of its kind in which planning permission has been granted in the UK.

“The petition is concerned with the adequacy of the treatment of the environmental impact of the project by the respondent and hence the grant of the planning permission.”

The hearing, before Lord Doherty, continues.

Related news


View our fact sheet on court reporting here




This site uses cookies. By continuing to browse the site you are agreeing to our use of cookies - Learn More